|
07-20-2013, 11:01 AM | #1 |
Jr. Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Western Ky
Posts: 17
|
Gasoline....low, mid or premium
I have a 05 Nomad, 20k area on ticker... only mods are Vance n Hines Bagger Pipes and a cobra fuel processor, <<-- try to remember to put that at beginning of all crazy question threds ....
Just wondering what most of you use when you top off your tank, regular, mid grade or premium....there is a little station that sells pure premium gas, no ethanol at all, close to the house, would you run that over regular gas...i have heard that low grade gas is just as good to run in one as premium...but ya read so much it gets confusing sometimes, at least i have only tried to put diesel in it once.... Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
07-20-2013, 11:06 AM | #2 | |
Sr. Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
__________________
Oldest Saloon In Nevada http://www.pioneersaloon.info/ "Sin City Stan" Henderson, NV VBA #01004 VROC #29365 2004 Nomad 1500L5 +100 "The Bike" 2009 Nomad 1700 (past) 2004 Vulcan Classic 800 (past) 2010 Cortez - 2011 Crescent City - 2012 Kanab - 2013 Estes Park |
|
|
07-20-2013, 12:21 PM | #3 |
Top Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Everett, Washington
Posts: 5,709
|
As a general rule....use the lowest grade fuel you can without pinging. My '08 Nomad would ping if I did not use Premium, but my 2013 Victory XCT runs fabulous on regular fuel. Pinging is simply the premature detonation of your fuel before your piston hits TDC. Adding octane to the fuel mixture delays the timing of the detonation. Some bikes need that higher octane fuel to run without pinging and some don't. You won't know until you try. You will most often get the pinging when the bike is under a load, like climbing a long hill. Lower grade fuel will leave less deposits of bad stuff in bad places in your engine, so the lower grade you can effectively run, the better. Once you realize that concept you better understand the whole fuel thing.
__________________
Kris Olsen VBA #0691 2017 HD Ultra Limited Low 2013 Victory Cross Country Tour 2012 1700 Vulcan Voyager 2008 1600 Vulcan Nomad 1997 Vulcan 800 Classic "Growing old is mandatory, but growing up is optional" Custer 2009|Kalispell 2010|Cortez 2010|Crescent City 2011|Kanab 2012|Canmore 2012|Estes Park 2013|Orofino 2014|Lake Tahoe 2015|Red Lodge 2016 |
|
07-20-2013, 01:21 PM | #4 |
I have a 07 nomad 1600, with the cobra processor and k and n air filter in right side mod along with V &H pipes. With just the pipes I run premium and avg 33.8MPG. added the processor set at 1.1.0 and ran mid grade avg. 32 MPG, then added the air filter mod and ran reg (processor set at 2.3.0) and now avg is at 38.9MPG. That is the way I run the bike now. I did a lot of testing, I could run reg gas and the cobra set at 3 1/2. 5.0 and get 33.5MPG with more seat of the pants power but I like the better MPG.
You already have the pipes and processor why not add the K and N filter and cover to the right side and open up the air intake....leave the stock filter in the left side and would will be good to go. |
|
|
07-20-2013, 07:55 PM | #5 |
Sr. Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 1,400
|
Just a heads up. Your owners manual states in several places in big bold block letters that using low octane fuel can result in engine damage.
Why take the chance to save $1 a tank up.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- '05 1600CL. Originator 18" Harley wheel mod, Dobeck TFI, True Duals, Mutazu hardbags, Flanders handlebars n' a bunch more. Sometimes I miss the good ol' days but most times I'm just glad I survived them Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
07-20-2013, 10:26 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: sparta, wi
Posts: 82
|
premium with no alcohol here....will get enough better mileage over e10 to pay for it plus the higher octane sounds good....just remember high octane means resists burning/igniting so when it is in the 20 or 30s here in wisconsin my 2002 nomad is rather cold blooded on it...and i have took apart enough engines that had predetination damage that i would worry about it....
|
|
07-21-2013, 11:01 AM | #7 |
Sr. Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 1,400
|
There are reasons you shouldn't burn low octane fuel in an engine designed for high octane. Heres how it was explained to me. Low oct and Hi oct have different burning rates. Hi oct has a longer combustion (slower) period than low oct. The Vulcan 1600 has whats called a long stroke engine. Long stroke engines require the slower burning rate to push the piston down the cylinder. Low octane burns to fast and has a hammering effect on the piston face and connecting rod bearings.
This explaination is simplified but you get the idea. If high octane isn't available you could run low octane to get you home but I wouldn't feed your bike a steady diet of it. Again I say why risk engine damage to save a few cents per fill up?
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- '05 1600CL. Originator 18" Harley wheel mod, Dobeck TFI, True Duals, Mutazu hardbags, Flanders handlebars n' a bunch more. Sometimes I miss the good ol' days but most times I'm just glad I survived them |
|
07-21-2013, 01:11 PM | #8 |
Top Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Everett, Washington
Posts: 5,709
|
I liken this debate to that of the car tire on a motorcycle. There are those who say you should not do it because a car tire is not made for a motorcycle. Those who run car tires will nod their head while you scold them, then go put 50k on one rear tire with zero issues whatsoever. There are those who say you should not run regular fuel in your bike because the book says so. Those who do just smile, pay $0.30 less per gallon at the pump, get better MPG's...and put 75k on their bikes with no problem. My own experience is that the ONLY operational difference on my 2013 XCT between running premium and running regular is about $1.25 per fill-up. There is no difference in performance whatsoever, with the possible exception of better MPG's. This is one of those things where you have to decide what works best for you.....
__________________
Kris Olsen VBA #0691 2017 HD Ultra Limited Low 2013 Victory Cross Country Tour 2012 1700 Vulcan Voyager 2008 1600 Vulcan Nomad 1997 Vulcan 800 Classic "Growing old is mandatory, but growing up is optional" Custer 2009|Kalispell 2010|Cortez 2010|Crescent City 2011|Kanab 2012|Canmore 2012|Estes Park 2013|Orofino 2014|Lake Tahoe 2015|Red Lodge 2016 |
|
07-21-2013, 08:43 PM | #9 |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Peoples Republic of New York State
Posts: 15,154
|
I will run 89 octane in my 08 Nomad but will not put a car tire on it.
I heard car tires on bikes cause the oil to work harder so it needs to be changed every 500 miles. There goes the money you save on tire wear
__________________
Tim "TC" Conley VBA #9 2011 Victory Kingpin mine 2013 Victory Boardwalk -hers [LEFT][COLOR=#000000] [SIZE=4]
Last edited by Top Cat; 07-21-2013 at 08:47 PM.
|
|
07-21-2013, 08:54 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bancroft,Id.
Posts: 335
|
My HD runs great on 87-88 octane. I found two stations close by that have gas without ethanol. One is premium and the other has 87. Seems to run even better on that stuff. its a few cents more though.
__________________
Tad "Caribou" Jensen VBA #1976 Bancroft,Idaho 2012 Electa Glide Classic 2003 Nomad FI(Past) _______________________________ I ain't never been lost, powerfull confused for a month or two, but never lost. |
|
07-21-2013, 09:32 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Berlin NH
Posts: 59
|
That would be my choice - low octane, no ethanol.
__________________
2004 Nomad 1500 Blue/Silver 2009 Classic 900lt Black/Blue Cardo Scala Rider Q2 multiset Tour Master riding gear |
|
07-21-2013, 11:08 PM | #12 | |
Sr. Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tamworth New Hampster 06 1600
Posts: 12,484
|
Quote:
'IF' there is a set up cobra fuel mod or a TFI, a big air kit and aftermarket exhaust there is a big difference as to what the engine should burn. The manual says this BS because the EPA rules to get these bike in the country require that BS, and the engines are so lean they PING on hi test, which is more BS. If he can get real gas he should burn that. E gas is just robbery and E takes up 10% space in the gas robs 10% power and robs 10% MPG's too. 'IF' he has a TFI or other well set up fuel mod he should burn the fuel rated for 9:1 compression engine which is 87 Octane for the best bang for the buck because it is. Burning a more evenly burning fuel is for high compression engines not Nomad that have a proper fuel mix which they don't get from the Factory. I can prove that and have more than once. If the bike engine is still stock you are correct sort of....... All stock engines are just overly lean from the factory period and are so starved for fuel that when you give them a 14:1 not only do you get more power you get a cooler running engine, and better moles per gallon. I did this to my 1500 and my 1600 and other peoples assorted 15 and 16's too. When I get get mariner fuel (no E) i get more power and go even further. E fuels are just one thing and one thing only a RIP OFF. Since June 06 my 06 has had no other fuel that 87 octane and i live in the mt's of NH and my bike does not ping, nor would I allow it to ping. I am a x foreign car tech by trade. My 06 looks brand new they say
__________________
06 1600 Nomad Just call me Mac molon labe come and get it |
|
|
07-21-2013, 11:12 PM | #13 | |
Sr. Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tamworth New Hampster 06 1600
Posts: 12,484
|
Quote:
You can't be serious about a ct making oil work harder......
__________________
06 1600 Nomad Just call me Mac molon labe come and get it |
|
|
07-21-2013, 11:17 PM | #14 | |
Sr. Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tamworth New Hampster 06 1600
Posts: 12,484
|
Quote:
Run real gas as often as you can find it. Think of ethanol as a filler that does nothing but maybe get out of the the way. It adds nothing but takes up 10% of the space real gas could be taking. It causes you too lose 10% power and 10% miles per gallon... And in and of it self it tends to lean out the fuel mix just because each and ever drop of gas is reduced by 10%. This ethanol is nothing more than robbery.......... There IS more power in regular gas than there is in high test gas. So run what ever is lowest octane so long as there is no PING.
__________________
06 1600 Nomad Just call me Mac molon labe come and get it |
|
|
07-22-2013, 12:43 AM | #15 |
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NW Region
Posts: 5,222
|
I only ran premium 92 in my Nomad. No pinging no issues.
For $45 per year difference in price I figured no reason to mess w/success. Especially since I probably made that $45 up in better MPG. I never ran regular so can't really compare MPG but I was consistently around 42....on the better side of most Nomads. I only run Premium in my ST as well. I get 40ish in town and 50ish on the road. About 44-45avg. That is doing manual calculation. The dash computer is 10% off (and the speedo is about 7% off). I thought Jap electronics were supposed to be very accurate?
__________________
VBA #659 2003 Nomad 1500 (Gone but never forgotten) 2005 Honda ST1300 - Sweet and still kickin 2006 Honda Goldwing - Best Boat in the Marina
Last edited by schoeney; 07-22-2013 at 12:48 AM.
|
|