|
10-26-2009, 09:52 AM | #16 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Horsepower and Torque
Quote:
if youre after maximum power, then you really have no option. if youre mildly interested, but the bike is running to your liking then its not really worth it as it puts a hell of a strain on everything. Remember this is a flat out wide open run, repeated as many as four times. I stood next to mine when it was done, and its brutal. After 3 runs on a dyno, its recommended to throw the rear tyre away due to tread strain. And I do know of one 98 classic that did not survive the dyno due to the rev limiter not working. So, its all up to you ::) Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
|
10-26-2009, 04:01 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 179
|
Horsepower and Torque
It cost me $250 for the dyno tuning. For the increase in power, I don't think it's worth it. For the fuel/air mixture to stay between 13:1 and 13.5:1 for the entire power range, then it was worth it. Can't give a recommendation one way or the other.
|
|
10-26-2009, 09:57 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: grand rapids, mi
Posts: 475
|
Horsepower and Torque
I dont' think mine was that hard on the bike. and I dont' think I was anywhere near needing a new tire. for me, he taylored it to my style of riding, which is lakeshore touring. so I get great milage during that and the piece of mind that I am not running lean. which, lets be honest, how many people know the correct way and take the time to read your plugs. I laid down a lot of cash for my ride. a couple hundred to make sure I am not doing any damage is worth it to me, plus the increased milage will pay for itself over time. power wise, I really don't think it was that much different than just the info you find on the net. but he said mine was running lean. all bikes are a little different. i'd do mine again just for the piece of mind..
|
|
10-28-2009, 03:19 PM | #19 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Västerås <sweden
Posts: 123
|
Horsepower and Torque
Quote:
crank. ;) I´ve got 105 hp on the wheel on my 2k.(PC,K&N and VH) |
|
|
10-28-2009, 04:17 PM | #20 |
Sr. Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,464
|
Horsepower and Torque
Lasse is correct, the V2K motor is 25% larger that our 1600s and easily 25% more powerful.
Borto is correct that we're not going to destroy rear tire on dyno. Mine's been on for a number of pulls and the bike is just not powerfull enough eat tires. Where we tested the main line of business is building 1/8 mile Harley drag engines and those do tear up tires (200HP is common). Stock my1600 had around 80 ft lbs TQ at around 2700 RPM and about 60HP at 4700 RPM at the rear wheel. I have never seen one done at the fly wheel but I keep remembering 64 HP and 87 TQ for those numbers but I don't remember where I got that. With pipes, a basic FI controller and a intake mod you can bump the HP about 4 and the TQ about 6. You can get more benefit from a 2 into one pipe but I rarely see anybody do that. And the parasitic drag of a shaft vs a belt vs a chain doesn't kill 30 HP. It is heavier than a chain or belt set up (tho not a lot more than the belt) and does contribute about 3-4% of the loss from fly wheel to rear wheel compared to about 1% for the chain or belt setup so it does adversley effect our performance a little but the Clucth/trans is a larger culprit contributing around 6% parasitic loss. And all combined you are talking about 9-10% or 6-7 HP. Oh and Hp dosen't really matter, the only number that is important is the TQ anyway.
__________________
trosco: just call me Ross 2007 Black & Titanium Nomad (Nomad made 65K but got replaced 2014) 2010 Titanium Goldwing 2014 KLR 650 New Edition Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
10-28-2009, 05:31 PM | #21 |
Sr. Contributor
|
Horsepower and Torque
Speaking of "Parasatic Drag" anyone seen Todd lately??
__________________
I love my Victory Cross Country Tour 106. Smells like Victory! Ultra's are Limited There are two types of Harley riders. Those that trailer them and those that push them. The most Interesting Man in the World "Find the things in life you don't do well and don't do those things" Member # 0005 |
|
10-29-2009, 07:50 AM | #22 |
Sr. Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,595
|
Horsepower and Torque
I wish I understood these matters better. I didn't buy the Nomad seeking a drag bike, and it had adequate and enjoyable power and acceleration. But what did Kawasaki gain by making a 1600 engine that produced 60 HP? It wasn't overwhelming torque. It wasn't phenomenal gas mileage. Nomads don't have either of those. So why didn't they give it 80 or 90 rear wheel hp, which would have been easily within what a 1552 cc engine can deliver and would have really added to the top end. They must have had a reason. What was gained?
__________________
Dan K Member #100 2009 ST1300: Performance exceeding even Victory riders' boasts. |
|
10-30-2009, 02:48 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: grand rapids, mi
Posts: 475
|
Horsepower and Torque
If they did that Dank, they wouldn't have anything to sell ya NEXT year
|
|
10-30-2009, 02:52 AM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: grand rapids, mi
Posts: 475
|
Horsepower and Torque
all that being said.. Im happy with my end result. Did the mods I wanted. Results were enough to make me happy. bike is new, one season in now, hopefully a few more trips before the snow flies. Now just sit back and enjoy it. Hopefully it will be a few seasons before I have to start posting in the "garage" section!
|
|
10-30-2009, 02:09 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Västerås <sweden
Posts: 123
|
Horsepower and Torque
We don´t need HP:s in these machines, but torque is
always nice to have.. Just my opinion.. ;) |
|
10-30-2009, 03:02 PM | #26 | |
Sr. Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,595
|
Horsepower and Torque
Quote:
__________________
Dan K Member #100 2009 ST1300: Performance exceeding even Victory riders' boasts. |
|
|
10-30-2009, 04:44 PM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 273
|
Horsepower and Torque
trosco knows his stuff. he has some good info. my nomad runs great with the mods i did. cobra pipes, 2000r, pro charger. it ain't no drag bike, and it won't come close to my wing or v-star 1300 on a 0 to 60. but it does what i expect it to well, and has all the power i want. if i want to go fast i will break out my zx-14. with the mods i have, boz bros gp full system, programed pc 111, mps air shifter. msd shift light, gi pro, 200 plus hp. it will put a load in your shorts if your not careful. be happy with your nomad the way it is. it was'nt meant to be a lion killer. if you want a real thrill, my 14 is for sale. just getting to old for this kids stuff. bill
|
|
10-30-2009, 05:07 PM | #28 |
Top Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fayetteville, Georgia
Posts: 5,792
|
Horsepower and Torque
Dang Bill, your zx-14 would probably give me a heart attack! I reckon I've had all the speed fun I need in my younger days.
__________________
Bob KawaNOW/VBA 210 Green/Silver 2006 Patriot Guard Riders 2009 |
|
10-31-2009, 01:19 AM | #29 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 273
|
Horsepower and Torque
Quote:
|
|
|
10-31-2009, 04:42 PM | #30 |
Sr. Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kerrville Tx
Posts: 1,713
|
Horsepower and Torque
Slow down and enjoy what you've been flying past. Load up those bags too and take some stuff with you. Wander around a bit like a real nomad would.
__________________
Robert(skeeter)Dozier 07 Red&Titanium Nomad 81 Suzuki 850GL KawaNow pre# |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quick question, horsepower for stock 06 1600? | deacon | Vulcan Nomad/Vaquero/Voyager | 14 | 04-27-2011 10:35 AM |
Torque wrenchs | moloprintz | Vulcan Nomad/Vaquero/Voyager | 9 | 09-23-2010 07:06 PM |
Earplugs increase horsepower! | nomadwest | Vulcan Nomad/Vaquero/Voyager | 15 | 08-16-2010 03:06 PM |
Torque specs | Cajunrider | 1500 & 1600 Nomad | 17 | 07-06-2010 03:08 AM |
OEM rated horsepower and torque | jlamz | Vulcan Nomad/Vaquero/Voyager | 29 | 11-26-2007 12:01 AM |